| Suffolk
NYCLU > News/Press > December
18, 2003, Committee on Education > Testimony
Testimony of Jared Feuer to the Assembly Standing Committee
on Education
Friday, December 18, 2003 – Suffolk County Legislature
Auditorium, Hauppauge, NY
My name is Jared Feuer. I am the Executive Director of the New
York Civil Liberties Union’s Suffolk Chapter, which covers
the 1,450,000 individuals living in Suffolk County. The NYCLU has
long been committed to enabling all students, regardless of background,
to have access to an education that not only prepares them for the
diverse opportunities of our great American economy, but just as
importantly, enriches them with the wealth of knowledge that can
and must be provided in our schools. To deny this education is counter
to our State Constitution, and as access is apportioned along racial,
regional and economic lines, it is discrimination in practice.
It is the position of the NYCLU that the need of our districts
could not be met by a simple increase of funding, or by providing
solutions designed to address the New York City District, or by
a one-size-fits-all solution. I wish for my testimony to build on
the groundwork of this premise.
The essence of the NYCLU’s assertion, as set forth in its
lawsuit in the Appellate Division, Third Dept (NYCLU v. State of
New York) is two-fold. Number one: New York City is not the only
locale where schools are failing our students. And number two: the
solution is to meet the particular needs of our diverse schools.
In my testimony, I will provide an overview of this framework through
a discussion of three schools. But I will also speak of what an
education should be and can be by telling of my own education in
a successful New York state public school, and I will offer why
such an education is often denied due to base discrimination.
When the NYCLU looked beyond the New York City district, it found
that school failure is not an inherent problem of urbanism and that
general reputations conceal fundamental inconsistencies. Suffolk
is a perfect example of these two findings. The reputation of our
county is of a white bedroom community where city-workers raise
children in excellent districts. In reality, Suffolk is a diverse
county, with a population that is quickly becoming more diverse.
11% of our population is of Latino background and 7% African American.
Some of our communities skew wealthy, others are quite poor. The
density of our towns varies widely, but what is essential to understand,
and what the State Assembly must come to truly accept, is that failing
schools exist throughout our state, and in places not expected.
In the course of preparing our lawsuit, the NYCLU became familiar
with the conditions and challenges facing teachers, administrators,
students, and parents in 27 schools in 13 school districts outside
of New York City. These 27 schools are emblems of hundreds of failing
schools, and we believe that a study of these particular schools
and their according remedies will reveal the need for a state-wide
remedy where each school is to be provided with a solution tailored
to its own needs.
Four of the 27 schools that the NYCLU examined in detail are in
Long Island, and I am going to discuss three of them today -- two
in Suffolk and one in Nassau County. The first is Milton L. Olive
School, which enrolls fifth-through-eighth graders in Wyandanch,
a city in the southwestern region of Suffolk. As a quick snapshot
of its academic difficulties, we can look at the May 2000 grade
eight English language arts examination in which 82% of test-takers
failed to meet the standards. Of this 82%, 29% were identified as
“having serious academic deficiencies,” while 53% were
in need of “extra help to meet the standards.” But the
resources to help Milton Olive students are severely limited, most
notably, the faculty. In the 1999-2000 school year, over half of
Milton Olive teachers were untenured, one out of five were new hires
at the start of the year, and six were added subsequently. Absenteeism
is also quite high, as, for example, during one day in December
2000, eleven absent teachers were replaced by a total of three substitutes.
To cover the ground of the eight missing teachers, the principal
and other administrators had to act as substitute teachers. We believe
that when New York State takes a look at this school and the students
in dire need of “extra help,” it will find that a significant
remedy for this school is to provide the students what they need
to learn: consistent access to a stable roster of teachers.
The high school for Wyandanch was placed on the Schools Under Registration
Review (SURR) list in December 2000, when it was a grade eight through
grade twelve school. Case in point: the June 1999 mathematics examination
was failed by 99% of eighth graders. Just one student met the standards.
When we looked at Wyandanch Memorial High School, its facilities
stood out as in dire need of attention. It was originally built
in 1932 and we found its furniture and fixtures to be particularly
antiquated. Its science labs needed new sinks, storage facilities
and equipment, its computers and software are not nearly adequate,
and the school lacks a computer technician to maintain what it does
have. We believe that when New York State takes a look at Wyandanch
Memorial, it will find a significant need to provide modern tools
of learning that can enable students to become familiar with the
new technology and science that is the backbone of our economy.
Marguerite Golden Rhodes Elementary is a first-through fifth grade
school in the village of Hempstead, which is located in Nassau.
The physical plant of Marguerite Golden Rhodes is in particularly
poor condition. Originally constructed in 1911, the school has long
since outgrown its space. It now has ten long wooden trailers, and
students must put on their coats and go outside to travel between
the trailers and the main building. Many of the portables are heated
unevenly, with one side stifling and the other extremely cold. The
main school has exposed searing hot pipes and radiators, its bathrooms
are dilapidated, with one urinal literally falling apart and the
nearby sink rotting. Moreover, there is only one boys’ and
one girls’ bathroom in the entire building. Space is severely
limited in Marguerite Golden Rhodes, the band room can only fit
six chairs and four music stands; there is no adequate art room
and no music room. Both the last music teacher and the last instrumental
teacher quit and moved to nearby districts where there are classes
for music instruction. A number of classrooms have been split in
half, which results in severe overcrowding, and finally, one room
serves as gym, auditorium, and cafeteria. The elementary school
has one small piece of playground equipment. When New York State
takes a close look at Hempstead, we believe it will find the physical
plant to be high on the list of necessary remedies.
While this information comes from our complaint in 2001, we do
not believe that the performance or conditions has changed since
that time. And further, we know that the appalling conditions that
we are describing have existed for many, many years, with the state
fully aware. In fact, since 1969, thirty-five years ago, the state
has known about the conditions in Wyandanch (and Roosevelt in Nassau
County). At this point, we’re dealing with generations of
neglect by the State.
Although many of the districts might differ in their pressing need,
we found that all shared the same basic conditions – they
are overcrowded, lack teacher and administrator stability, parental
involvement, and have poor physical plants and a lack of modern
supplies. The question is how to address these problems, and in
what ways. Just a cursory glance at three failing schools shows
that these problems present themselves in different degrees and
in different ways. Fiscal resources are a significant need, as the
failing schools that we examined were severely under-funded. A recent
national study by Education Week ranked New York State #1 in the
nation in the quality of its standards, but #48 in the equity of
its school finance system. Clearly, there is a breakdown in commitment
between those dictating the standards and those providing the funding.
But we do not want New York to only provide increased fiscal resources
for its troubled schools. Moreover, many communities can not tax
themselves into adequate funding. Hempstead taxes itself at twice
the rate of the more prosperous area of Great Neck, and yet due
to its lower tax base, it yields half the revenue. New York must
dedicate itself to examining how to devote custom-built resources
for each school, and create regular programs for follow-up. We believe
that New York State will need to develop teacher training programs,
provide continuing education opportunities for faculty, create programs
for increased parental involvement, and target where fiscal resources
can best be used.
I’d like to take a moment to offer a reflection on my own
education. I attended public school in the northern part of Westchester,
and I never remember shivering or being too hot in class. The teachers
that I had were the teachers that my siblings had years later. I
remember my elementary library as particularly large, with three
separate sections and a comfortable reading area. While Milton Olive
still does not have computers with Internet Access or even CD-ROMs,
I remember being introduced to school computers in 1983, provided
with access to school CD-ROMs by 1989, and Internet access by 1990.
In fact, now that I think back on it, I was raised during the launch
of the personal computer, and my school always made sure that its
students were right on the cusp of this new technology. When the
opportunity to make economic use of computers came about, my classmates
were poised to take advantage. We can not say the same about students
in Wyandanch and Milton Olive. And one basic reason is that my students
came from families that were prosperous and white.
For a final shared condition that we found in failing schools is
that they are minority-majority districts, and poor. In Marguerite
Rhodes in the 98-99 school year, 46.7% of students were African
American and 51% were of Latino origin. .4% were white. Almost 100%
of the families of Marguerite Rhodes students are on public assistance.
At Milton L. Olive, 90% received a free or reduced-price lunch.
89.5% were African American and 9.5% were of Latino origin. Once
again, white students were missing – only 1% were white. This
pattern continues at Wyandanch Memorial, where 91.3% were African
American, 7.9% of Latino origin and .8% were white. Almost 70% of
the families of Wyandanch Memorial students receive public assistance.
The reality is that when you look at neglected schools that lack
even the basic necessities to educate their students, you find that
they are populated by minorities and by the poor. New York State’s
education system, from rural to suburban and urban, from Buffalo
to Albany to Suffolk, discriminates based on the background to which
our children are born. That is a fact that the Assembly must accept.
Why does the Assembly have such a responsibility? In part, because
the decision in CFE v New York State in 1995 declared that the New
York State Constitution requires a sound basic education, and in
2003, the Court of Appeals in CFE II ruled that such an education
is “a meaningful high school education,” that provides
students with the skill to function capably as civic participants,
to be prepared for employment in the 21st century. But this is not
just a Constitutional issue, an economic issue, or even a discrimination
issue. We are discussing a moral issue today. Education is the basis
for how we perceive the world, how we use existing knowledge to
process new information, how we decipher problems and devise solutions.
And this quest to develop an appropriate New York State educational
system is such a challenge. The Suffolk NYCLU strongly encourages
the Standing Committee to approach this problem methodically and
with flexibility. And to recommend to the State Assembly a process
for the State to provide state education officials who will meet
with local school officials and parents and community representatives,
as well as education experts, and to develop, collectively, a remedial
plan tailored to each of these failing schools that the State will
then be required to fund and to implement. When this problem is
addressed across New York, we will have a public school system that
meets the requirements of Article XI, Section 1 of our State Constitution,
and one in which we can be proud.
It is my hope that I have proven that failure exists not just in
New York City, but across our state in similar and divergent ways,
and why the Assembly must act. The Suffolk NYCLU thanks you for
your time, and we offer any assistance that the Committee might
find helpful.
|